formerly

Home | Introduction | Articles | Events | Links | Marketplace | Membership | Newsletters | Contact Info 06/12/2008

Up ] Biomass and Oil Content of Eastern Redcedar ] [ Cellulosic Ethanol from Wood: Has Its Time Come? ] Grading Rules for Eastern Red Cedar ] Heat Energy from Wood ] ORIENTED STRAND BOARDS ] Some Pests of Eastern Redcedar ] There are Trees in Oklahoma! ] Wood-Water Relationships: Part I ] Wood-Water Relationships: Part II ]

Cellulosic Ethanol from Wood: Has Its Time Come?

 

Cellulosic Ethanol from Wood: Has Its Time Come?

Craig McKinley
Oklahoma State University

Printed in The Cedar Leader Apr-Jun 2008

We are all too familiar with the current cost of petroleum energy. In the last few months the prices of gasoline, diesel, and other similar fuels have risen at an astounding rate, and based on media reports, further increases are forthcoming.

One outfall of the rise in fuel costs has been an increased interest in using ethanol as either a substitute or additive for gasoline. A number of service stations in the U. S. currently offer E85 (85% ethanol, 25 % gasoline) for automotive use, and we can expect more widespread ethanol availability in the future.

Ethanol is manufactured through the fermentation of sugars by microbial action (yeasts), followed by distillation and then removal of water. To date most of the U. S. ethanol production has been by using corn as the basic feedstock because of the ease with which corn starch can be converted to sugar then fermented.

A relatively new approach to ethanol production is that of cellulosic ethanol. This ethanol is produced from plant structural material, and as the name implies, a majority of this raw material is comprised of cellulose. Cellulose consists of long chains of glucose molecules, with glucose being the same sugar that is derived for fermentation from corn. Thus, ethanol is the same whether from corn or cellulosic materials. Examples of these cellulosic materials include switchgrass, straw, barley, and even wood.

Since wood is readily available in many parts of the United States (to include possibly redcedar in Oklahoma), why has there not been more emphasis placed on producing ethanol from wood? The answer lies in the fact that fermenting of sugar from corn is a much easier (and cheaper) process than removing non-cellulose sugars and lignin from wood, then fermenting.

The U.S. Department of Energy estimates that it costs almost twice as much to produce ethanol from cellulosic materials as from corn. In 2006, the cost of producing cellulosic ethanol was estimated at $2.25 per gallon. At that price, it would cost about $120 to substitute for a barrel of oil. That $120 oil price might have looked unreal in 2006, but today oil has topped $100 per barrel, with future increases expected. Couple that with recent increases in corn prices, and previous economic assumptions are becoming rapidly outdated.

No doubt, wood is also getting a second look. Of the 21 cellulosic ethanol plants in the United States that are currently either planned, under construction or in operation, eight are specifically designated as using wood chips or wood waste as the raw material. The first of these plants, in Upton, Wyoming, became operational in February of this year.
With this kind of interest and activity, can red cedar ethanol be far behind?


 

 

 

Copyright © 2006 Aromatic Cedar Association | Home | Site Map | Contact Info